Nonviolence and hypocrisy in Burma
<a href='http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/20071001.html'>On Angelfire</a>
Unapologetically bourgeois. Proudly intolerant of idiocy.
<a href='http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/20071001.html'>On Angelfire</a>
<a href='http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/marlowe/pressureweasel.html'>On Angelfire</a>
Or is it just this bunch?
(Hey, odanny started it!)
Something for the conspiracy theory buffs out there. Yeah, it's the New York Times, but they're not *always* wrong. Besides, the Miami Herald got there first.
I recently jumped into the discussion on the forvm (just how do you pronounce that, anyway?) on what sort of system there should be for selecting articles. In the course of that, Aurelius made a comment that he wants a system based on honor and trust, and therefore wants the site to stay small.
Still a lot of explaining to do
This is the dox-in-sox guy from a year or so ago. He got off with a slap in the wrist. Well, now it's October surpise season, with everybody exposing everybody. So he's fair game again.
What's going on here?
A development you may or may not have been following
In a phrase: respect for the law.
They're back!
Well, I'm in a particularly intolerant mood lately, and here's why.
If you can't rebut, try silencing your opponent
Okay, we've all seen the scare quotes. Many of us have hyperventilated and spun conspiracy theories over Bush's determination to let an Arab-owned company run our ports, or something. Some of us have seen the overly protesting pooh-pooh treatment in an editorial on the Financial Times. So what's this all about? Is it a big deal?
I watched the President's State of the Union speech. It was a speech that had to be seen to be fully appreciated. It wasn't just Bush talking. It was the interaction from the audience. Particularly the left half. Bush was tactically brilliant. He grabbed everything that had been thrown at him - the wiretap controversy, Social Security, spending, the energy crunch, Abramoff - and threw it right back, and most of it stuck. His enemies keep making the same two mistakes: they see him as vulnerable where he isn't, and they fail to see their own vulnerabilities on the exact same issues. It's as if they're projecting their own failings on to him.
It looks like someone has gone beyond repeating the errors of others and taken a novel approach to making a gateway from the Web to Freenet. This one actually seems to be holding up at the moment:
Winning the war at home
Well, I saw that speech, and I didn't much like it. Oh, it was very well delivered, but the content was less than I had come to expect from this man. Lots of people liked it, for the wrong reasons. But it was a mediocre speech, lacking good ideas, and implying bad ideas.
I may have to do a whole section on the lies surrounding Katrina and the destruction of New Orleans. But for now, I'll just draw attention to what redstate.org has pieced together
Don't blame Mother nature. Much of New Orleans was below sea level.
When this is all over, I might do a timeline on this sad but silly episode. I've lost siblings to violence, and I'm happy to say that my mother handled it much better than Casey Sheehan's did. But then, she could hardly miss. If Casey had been my brother - making Cindy my mother - I'd have bitch slapped her. On TV, if possible. Her own family has begged her to stop and left it at that, but that's carrying restraint too far.
1215, England - the Magna Carta establishes the principle of rule of law in England. Many of its provisions restrict the crown's liberty to seize the lands of freeholders. It does not, however, categorically prohibit seizure of private estates by the government.
Senator Cornyn (R-TX) has introduced bill S.1313 to limit eminent domain abuse.
Joe Biden backs away
Unconscious? Vegetative? And yet she blinks furiously. The case of Kate Adamson leaves no excuses intact.
It is a cardinal principle of stupidity that if something just isn't working, do more of it. It is also a cardinal principle of the squishy left ("liberals") which the hard Left strongly encourages. Well, the Democratic National Committee has just selected Howard Dean as chairman. We all remember Howard Dean, right? He was that lunatic that said all sorts of mind-numbingly stupid things, then started screaming in Iowa. He epitomizes all that is wrong with the party.
Well, I was going to do a long series of posts on the implications of all this, but I had too many prior committments, and events are overtaking me. So, this instead.
Well, the non-left-wing blogs all over the place have been on this Eason Jordan thing, to the point that even Kos has had to make a snarky remark about it, but I think I'd better help make sure there's no one left who can ignore this. So let's get this out of the way...
for haters of democracy everywhere.
Excerpt:
All the media keeps talking about is how happy the Iraqis are, how high turnout was, and how "freedom" has spread to Iraq. I had to turn off CNN because they kept focusing on the so-called "voters" and barely mentioned the resistance movements at all. Where are the freedom fighters today? Are their voices silenced because some American puppets cast a few ballots?
I say:
Want a shoulder to cry on, ShinerTX? Look elsewhere.
How fashions change. The "freedom fighters" are so yesterday. The *real* freedom fighters are the in thing.
At least most idiotarians have the presence of mind to try desperately to pretend they're not impressed. This turd can't even manange a sour grapes reaction. He just vents.
Oh, and here's some more unhappy freedom haters in jolly old England.
Excerpt:
The demonstrators were from Hizb-ut-Tahrir - an Islamic group which is against the elections in Iraq.
David Kahrmann, from the Iraq Election Team, said the protesters "were not even Iraqis". "The Iraqi community here were saying, 'Why are these people who are not even from Iraq protesting against these elections?'," he said.
Dr Abdul Wahid, of Hizb-ut-Tahrir, said his demonstrators had begun walking away from the scene after election organisers said they were worried their presence could prove trouble.
He said: "The local Iraqis came out and got very agitated. We walked away, but a small group started chasing us."
I say:
Cowards. Say, it's nice of BBC news to report this, as if they'd never lied and spun everything about Iraq all these years. I remember their glum faces when mean old Uncle Sam first went in to take out sweet gentle Uncle Saddam.
Angelfire link (turn off Javascript to avoid popups)
Freenet: /SSK@jbf~W~x49RjZfyJwplqwurpNmg0PAgM/marlowe/iraq.html#20050130b